By Robert F. Worth
The New York Times, 23 March 2006
SULAIMANIYA, Iraq, March 19 — Like most young Kurds in this northern city, Asad Ali does not speak Arabic. He has heard about the rising wave of sectarian killings down in Baghdad, but it seems a world away from the quiet rhythms of daily life here in Kurdistan.
So when a discussion broke out near an outdoor book market about whether there would be civil war between Shiite and Sunni Arabs in Iraq, Mr. Ali, a 24-year-old who wears rimless glasses and blue jeans, did not hesitate to give his opinion.
"It is beautiful that our enemies are killing each other," he said with a grim chuckle.
It is not an unusual view here. Kurdistan may be part of Iraq in the legal sense, but most Kurds view the Arabs, whether Sunni or Shiite, as foreign oppressors. The fact that the Arabs are now fighting among themselves evokes little sympathy.
For many Kurds, the main danger of a civil war is that it might spread northward, threatening the relative stability they have enjoyed since the American invasion in 2003. Although Kurdistan is virtually an ethnic monolith, the major cities on its borders, Kirkuk and Mosul, have substantial Arab populations and are far more violent.
So the prospect of a civil war makes many Kurds yearn all the more fiercely for separate national status. Some even say such a war might help them make their case.
"I think the violence down in Baghdad will lead Kurdistan to independence," said Muhsin Khidir, 30, who was taking a cigarette break near the booksellers. "We don't want that kind of fighting here. If civil war breaks out in Iraq, I'm sure we will have the support of the international community, and we'll just declare ourselves independent."
Older Kurds, who came of age before Kurdistan became an autonomous region in 1991, tend to be more worried about the violence in central Iraq, and more hopeful that their own political leaders can play a mediating role. But they too wonder whether a broader conflict might have accidental benefits.
"I don't like to get my rights in the tragedy of others," said Asos Hardi, 43, a journalist who helped found Hawlati, Kurdistan's main independent newspaper. "But if it will happen and Iraq will become a second Afghanistan, why should we continue with them? It is a logical question."
Kurdistan had its own civil war in the 1990's, when its two main political parties fought for control. Many Kurds do not want to become involved in another war. They are also deeply resentful of Iraqi Arabs, who carried out brutal attacks on Kurdish villages during the reign of Saddam Hussein.
Evidence of that animosity can be found almost anywhere. At the outdoor book market — which sits under a vast mural of Sheik Mahmoud al-Hafeed, the rebel leader who is considered the father of modern Kurdistan — one of the most popular titles is a paperback called "The Bloody History of the Arabs: A Summary." On its cover was a lurid color illustration of a hooded skeleton strangling a beautiful young woman.
But separating from Iraq would be difficult, if not impossible. Apart from any objections the Arabs might raise, Turkey has at least 12 million Kurds within its borders, and has made clear that it would not tolerate an independent Kurdistan. Iran and Syria have Kurdish populations, too, and would probably also object.
At the book market, those facts prompted a brief debate about which group was the Kurds' worst enemy.
"Who's the worst? It's clear that it's the Arabs," said Hiwa Muhammad, a 21-year-old English major.
"I disagree, I think the Turks are the worst," interjected Luqman Saleh, 32, a store clerk. "So many Kurds were killed by the Turks."
"No, the main enemy of the Kurds is the Persians," said Jamil, a 50-year-old engineer. "I can prove it: they are against our religion, because we are Sunnis. And they are against our national identity as Kurds."
For a brief moment last year, it seemed that the friendless Kurds had found an ally in the Iraqi Shiites. Both groups suffered atrocities under Mr. Hussein, and after emerging from the January 2005 elections as the two largest blocs, they agreed to form a governing coalition.
The amity did not last long. Iraq's Kurdish president, Jalal Talabani, accused Ibrahim al-Jaafari, the Shiite prime minister, of ignoring Kurdish demands. Last month, Mr. Talabani was furious after Mr. Jaafari went on a state visit to Turkey, the Kurds' historic nemesis, without informing him.
Mr. Jaafari was soon being portrayed in Kurdish newspapers as the latest in a long line of betrayers of the Kurds. The Kurdish leadership sent a letter to the Shiites saying they could not work with Mr. Jaafari, and demanding that he be replaced.
Since then, there has been speculation here that the Sunni Arabs might make better political allies than the Shiites. But with government talks in a stalemate and talk of a possible civil war in the air, many Kurds would rather not take sides.
"It's clear that the civil war will be intensified," Mr. Ali said with a shrug. "The Shiites have come to power, and the Sunnis won't accept it. But we have a Kurdish proverb, 'If the fire is far from me, it's not a problem.' "
------------------------------------
Citation: Robert F. Worth. "In Placid Iraqi Kurdistan, Strife to the South Elicits Little Sympathy," The New York Times, 23 March 2006.
Original URL: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/23/international/middleeast/23kurds.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
------------------------------------